Skip to main content

Section 8.4 Homotopy Extension and Lifting

We can now state HELP precisely. The proof follows the same pattern as the proof of the HEP: solve the problem for a single cell, then extend over the relative skeleta. In the single-cell case, the connectivity of \((M_e, Y)\) supplies the required homotopy.
In a shorter form, HELP says the following. Given a diagram of pairs
whose square commutes up to a prescribed homotopy \(H\) (that is, \(H\) is a homotopy from \(f|_A\) to \(e\circ g\)), there is a lift \(\widetilde g\colon X\to Y\) extending \(g\) such that \(e\circ\widetilde g\simeq f\) by a homotopy extending \(H\text{.}\) The cylinder diagram records this homotopy explicitly: the upper triangle commutes strictly, while the lower triangle commutes up to the specified homotopy.

Remark 8.7.

Two special cases explain the name and the role of HELP.
  1. If \(e = \mathrm{id}_Y\text{,}\) then \(g=h_1\) and the required lift is simply \(\widetilde g=\widetilde h_1\text{.}\) The only task is to extend \(h\cup f\) from \(A\times I\cup X\times\{0\}\) to \(X\times I\text{.}\) This is exactly the HEP, with the strict initial compatibility \(h_0=f|_A\text{.}\)
  2. If \(A = \varnothing\text{,}\) every map from a CW complex of dimension \(\leq n\) to \(Z\) lifts through \(e\) up to homotopy.
We use the following lemma without proof for now; a proof using fibrations and homotopy fibres is given in Section 10.5.

Proof.

Proof of Theorem 8.6. We induct over the relative skeleta. Write
\begin{equation*} A=X_{-1}\subseteq X_0\subseteq X_1\subseteq\cdots\subseteq X, \qquad X=\bigcup_n X_n, \end{equation*}
where \(X_n\) is obtained from \(X_{n-1}\) by attaching the relative \(n\)-cells. Suppose that maps \(G_{n-1}\colon X_{n-1}\to Y\) and \(H_{n-1}\colon X_{n-1}\times I\to Z\) have already been constructed, extending the given data on \(A\text{.}\) For \(n=0\text{,}\) extend over each new point using the surjectivity of \(\pi_0(Y)\to\pi_0(Z)\text{;}\) assume \(n\geq1\) below.
For each \(n\)-cell, with characteristic map \(\Phi\colon D^n\to X_n\) and attaching map \(\varphi\colon S^{n-1}\to X_{n-1}\text{,}\) apply Lemma 8.8 to the data
\begin{equation*} f\circ\Phi,\qquad G_{n-1}\circ\varphi,\qquad H_{n-1}\circ(\varphi\times\mathrm{id}_I). \end{equation*}
The resulting maps on \(D^n\) and \(D^n\times I\) agree with the old maps on the attaching sphere, so they glue over all the \(n\)-cells to give \(G_n\) and \(H_n\) on \(X_n\text{.}\)
The inductive step can be summarized by the following diagram. The maps \(G_{n-1}\) and \(H_{n-1}\) have already been constructed on the previous stage; the disc lemma supplies the dashed extensions \(G_n\) and \(H_n\text{:}\)
The bottom map is \(H_{n-1}\) on \(X_{n-1}\times I\) and \(f\) on \(X_n\times\{0\}\text{;}\) these agree on \(X_{n-1}\times\{0\}\text{.}\)
The compatible maps \(G_n\) and \(H_n\) assemble into \(\widetilde g\colon X\to Y\) and \(\widetilde h\colon X\times I\to Z\text{.}\) They are continuous by the weak topology, also on the cylinder since \(I\) is compact. Their restrictions give all the required endpoint and extension conditions.
Taking the prescribed homotopy to be constant gives a useful relative form of HELP. It extends the compression criterion for a disc to relative CW complexes.

Proof.

Apply HELP to the inclusion \(e \colon B \hookrightarrow Z\text{,}\) an \(n\)-equivalence, with \(g := f|_A\) and \(h\) the constant homotopy. Then \(\widetilde{h}\) is a homotopy rel \(A\) from \(f\) to \(e \circ \widetilde{g}\text{,}\) which has image in \(B\text{.}\)